Why do episcopalians accept gays




















The Episcopal Church also approved transgender ordination at its General Convention. Women have been ordained priests and elected bishops in the Episcopal Church since By clicking "GO" below, you will be directed to a website operated by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, an independent c 3 entity. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. To learn more, please read our Privacy Policy.

Accept More Information. Love conquers hate. Tuesday's vote followed the church's decision on Monday to allow the ordination of transgender people. That vote to change to the church's "nondiscrimination canons" to include "gender identity and expression" overwhelmingly passed the church House of Bishops and House of Deputies.

It makes it illegal to bar from the priesthood people who were born into one gender and live as another or who do not identify themselves as male or female. It added to church rules against discrimination based on race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, disability and age.

The Episcopal Church is the U. In addition to its U. Liberal trends in the church regarding the ordination of gay priests and bishops have increasingly strained its relations with its more conservative counterparts in the United Kingdom and Africa. The election in of its first gay bishop, the Rt.

Gene Robinson of New Hampshire, caused several dioceses to defect. From the beginning of Genesis, human beings are described as having a need for relationship, just as God himself is relational. Mainstream denominations like Presbyterians and Episcopalians now ordain openly gay clergy, and there are seeds of change in evangelical churches as well.

Matthew Vines is the author of God and the Gay Christian and is the founder of The Reformation Project, a Bible-based non-profit organization that seeks to reform church teaching on sexual orientation and gender identity. Matthew lives in Wichita, Kansas. Contact us at letters time.

By Matthew Vines. Death penalty. Human rights. Gays in the military. Stem cells. Other topics. Religious laws. Religious news. Overview The Episcopal Church in the U.

It stayed united: During the 19th century's racist and human rights conflicts, when many other denominations split into pro-slavery and pro-abolition groups. During the early 20th century debates over whether married couples should have access to contraception. During the 20th century's sexist debates over whether qualified women should be eligible for ordination as priests.

It involves whether: Sexually active gays and lesbians in committed relationships should be eligible for consideration for ordination as priests and consecration as bishops. Whether the church should bless unions between loving, committed gay and lesbian couples. What is the nature of the conflict? There are many aspects to the heated, emotional debates over homosexuality -- both within the Episcopal church and the rest of society: Sexual sin: There are differences in belief about whether homosexual activities are always sinful.

There is a near consensus among American Episcopalians and Canadian Anglicans that sex outside of a committed relationship, unsafe sex, coercive sex, sex between related persons, or sex between persons of inappropriate ages, is sinful -- whether performed by a same-sex or opposite-sex couple. However there is no consensus over whether same-sex behavior is always sinful.

Most liberals in the denomination would argue that the same rules apply for opposite-gender and same-gender couples: sex is not sinful if it is safe, non-coercive, and truly consensual, within a committed relationship between any two adults. Most conservatives argue that all same-sex behavior is intrinsically sinful, no matter what the circumstances or the depth of the relationship between the participants. The nature of homosexuality : There is no agreement over what homosexuality is: Most conservatives feel that it is a behavior -- what one does.

It is chosen, abnormal, and unnatural. Most liberals feel that it is a sexual orientation -- a part of what one is. It is not chosen, and is both normal and natural for a minority of adults. Independence of the General Convention: Another aspect to the debate, at least within the Episcopal Church relates to the degree of independence of an Anglican province from the larger Communion.

There is disagreement over whether a national or regional convention has the authority to deviate from the policies established by the entire Anglican Communion at the Lambeth Conferences. These are meetings held every ten years at which Anglican delegates from all of the world's provinces meet. Ultimately, the majority of delegates passed a resolution stating, in part: The church rejects " homosexual practice as incompatible with the Scripture.

How to interpret the Bible: Liberal and conservative Anglicans disagree over the implications in today's culture of the ten or so passages in the Bible which appear to condemn some homosexual behaviors. They cannot reach a consensus over whether these passages: Condemn all homosexual behavior, or Only censure specific activities like homosexual rape, homosexual prostitution, homosexual behaviors by persons with a heterosexual orientation.

Financial aspects: Another aspect to the debate is whether the losers in the debate over homosexual rights will retaliate by reducing financial contributions to their local congregation and to the denomination itself.

Many local churches are in an extremely precarious financial situation, and cannot survive a significant decrease in support for long. Why has this controversy hit the Anglican Communion at this time?

As of , conservative denominations have not yet begun to significantly change. Mainline denominations are now seriously split on the matter.

Robinson Go to the previous page , or return to the Episcopal Church and homosexuality menu , or choose:. Popular Pages Home. Seasonal topics Science v. Religion More info. Top Menu. Follow Us. All rights reserved.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000